An engaging and brilliantly acted drama.

In Victorian England, the independent and headstrong Bathsheba Everdene (Carey Mulligan) attracts three very different suitors: Gabriel Oak (Matthias Schoenaerts), a sheep farmer; Frank Troy (Tom Strurridge), a reckless Sergeant; and William Boldwood (Michael Sheen) a prosperous and mature bachelor.

I’m not normally one for period dramas but somehow this one managed to keep my attention.

I haven’t read the classic novel nor have I seen the 1967 feature with Julie Christie so I can’t make comparisons.

Carey Mulligan was superb as Bathsheba (Such a strange name). Perfectly cast as the strong willed heroine. A different kind of beauty but still a pretty young lady.

A woman desperate not to be another man’s property. Defying type and “social standing” to be her own person.

The opening act may have been slow burning but I was happy to watch the blossoming romance between Gabriel and Bathsheba.

Matthias Schoenarts delivered a very good performance. I know people were sceptical about having a Belgian as the farm hand in something that should have been a quintessentially English affair but I thought he was charismatic and had fantastic chemistry with Mulligan.

By comparison, his performance in A Little Chaos was quite wooden.

As well as dealing with the ever-growing suitors, Bathsheba inherits her uncle’s farm and is determined to restore the place to its former glories. Her dealings in the markets and with her staff made for good viewing. Resourceful and resilient, but vulnerable and anxious.

Sheen delivered a fine turn as the strange and brooding Mr Boldwood. Hell, we even got a little sing song between him and Mulligan.

I knew Mulligan could sing after her turn in Shame but it was certainly unexpected from the Sheenster.

Tom Sturridge (The Boat That Rocked) played the slick solider Frank Troy well. A slimy charmster if ever there was one.

I couldn’t help but question why Bathsheba would be interested in such a tool.

Troy was certainly enigmatic and a sweet talker but his behaviour was so volatile. Their forest fling was a strange encounter. His OTT sword swinging foreplay was a little comical for me. It killed the brewing tension between them.

BUT I understood that the action was supposed to display a sense of danger and excitement that the other suitors weren’t offering.

Is that all they do in the countryside? Shear sheep and marriage, apparently.

It was obvious that the proposals would happen. But the timing was certainly unexpected. Boldwood’s proposal was too sudden.

Sparked by a Valentine card that Bathsheba had sent as a joke. His sudden infatuation and obsession with her seemed a little disjointed. Ridiculously extravagant in one exchange, then nothing the next.

Yet somehow you still felt sorry for the middle aged extrovert.

The cast couldn’t be faltered. Their performances were flawless and I actually cared what happened to the characters.

Each suitor offering something different for Bathsheba. Security, love and danger. But all to a woman who never promised anything and already expressed that she did not want to be “tamed”.

Every time I felt my interest dipping or the pace lulling, there would be a new development or twist that kept me going. Not that my interest dipped that much, to be honest.

A merciless sheepdog with a flock certainly delivered a unexpected cliffhanger.

Charlotte Bruus Christensen’s cinematography was superb. Despite its beautifully shot idyllic backdrop, horror and grief can still strike the countryside.

The only critique I can make about the casting was Juno Temple. She didn’t make as much of an impact as I expected. The role was still important to the story line but anyone could have played her.

The ending may have been a little predictable but I still came out smiling and impressed. Don’t say that often enough.

It was easygoing, engaging and wonderfully acted. One of the better films out there.

Highly recommend.



    1. I was really impressed with this film. Normally I’m straight on my phone or fidgeting when it comes to these genres but it kept my interest and has been one of the better ones 🙂

      1. but that’s so rude tho!! bad bad you! haaaha 😀 I’m not sure where you live but you would be kicked out of the theatre here.. nothing more annoying than someone on their phone or chatting while the film is on.

      2. Haha I’m sorry. I keep it on silent if that’s any consolation 😀 I can’t stand people talking. I may hate a film but I won’t rant out load if there are other movie goers. That’s not fair on people who are enjoying it (even if it is TERRIBLE!) Lol

  1. no the light from the phone shines brightly which is worse. and distracting.. do they not have message and all where u are telling you to not text, talk, email, etc.. we do and they tell you you will be booted if you do. We had some girl at Ultron who did it.. she was out in an instant. So this is your warning to be careful not to do it if you ever come to the US.. ha!

    1. Wow consider myself told. They take the movie experience seriously in the U.S. I wish it was like that here. Good luck telling the kids in England to stop using their phones. The ushers get so much grief and no! Not from me haha. I manage to get the front section where no one likes to sit and then I use my phone for a cheeky movie rant 😉 but I’ll try my best not to.

      1. Usually don’t have to many kids in my screenings but yeah..you pay to watch a movie, why should someone else ruin it for you? When you’re in the front you do realize your phone lights up for ALL the people behind you riiigghht??!!! You would not fare well here I’m afraid. People will tell you nicely once.. then it’s war. But I must say, since most know how obnoxious it is to do, very few people actually do it. It’s just good manners. Funny hearing that come from an American vs. a Brit I know.. 🙂

Comments are closed.